Perspektif Analisis Stakeholder Pada Perguruan Tinggi : Sebuah Pengalaman Praktis Dari Literatur Terdahulu

Hafid Aditya Pradesa, Ramdani Priatna, Alikha Novira

Abstract


Masalah identifikasi dan manajemen pemangku kepentingan relatif dipahami dengan baik dalam literatur untuk organisasi sektor swasta. Artikel ini menawarkan gagasan tentang pentingnya analisa stakeholder yang matang dalam sebuah organisasi perguruan tinggi. Setelah perumusan visi, misi, tujuan dan sasaran (VTMS) yang jelas, mengelola stakeholder merupakan isu krusial yang perlu digarisbawahi dalam pengelolaan organisasi yang dimulai dari sebuah perencanaan strategis. Melakukan analisa stakeholder  merupakan bentuk upaya mengakui atau menangani peran pemangku kepentingan yang sangat penting partisipasi dan dampak dari nilai-nilai pemangku kepentingan pada hasil manajemen berbasis proses di perguruan tinggi untuk mencapai sasaran dan tujuan dengan lebih efektif.



Keywords


stakeholder theory; analisis stakeholder; perguruan tinggi; literature review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Botha, Rj (Nico).2007.School-based management: stakeholder participation and the impact of stakeholder values. Africa Education Review, 4(1), 28-41, DOI:10.1080/18146620701412126.

Alves,H., Mainardes, E.W., Raposo, M. (2010).A Relationship Approach to Higher Education Institution Stakeholder Management, Tertiary Education and Management, 16:3, 159-181

Baldwin, L. (2002). Total quality management in higher education: The implications of internal and external stakeholder perceptions. Masters thesis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM.

Bischoff, K., Volkmann, C. K., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Stakeholder collaboration in entrepreneurship education: an analysis of the entrepreneurial ecosystems of European higher educational institutions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 20–46. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9581-0.

Burrows, J. (1999). Going beyond labels: A framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 5–10.

Brown, S. (1999). A systemic perspective on higher education in the United Kingdom. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(2) 157–169.

Bryson, J. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6, 21–53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722.

Chapleo, C.; Simms, C. (2010) .Stakeholder analysis in higher education A case study of the University of Portsmouth. Perspectives, Vol. 14, No.1, pp.12- 20.

Czuchry, A., Yasin, M. and Gonzales, M. (2004), “Effective entrepreneurial education: a framework for innovation and implementationâ€, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 39-56.

Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

Harvey, L. (1999, August 7–10). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Paper presented at the European Association of Institutional Research, Lund, Sweden.

Kettunen, Juha.(2015).Stakeholder relationships in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, pp. 1 – 10. DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2014.997277.

Koksal, G. and Egitman, A. (1998), “Planning and design of industrial engineering education

qualityâ€, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 639-42.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle or who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886. doi:10.2307/259247.

Reavil, L.R. (1998), “Quality assessment, total quality management and the stakeholders in the UK higher education systemâ€, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 55-63.

Vollmers, S.M., Ratliff, J.M. and Hoge, B. (2001), A Framework for Developing Entrepreneurship Curriculum through Stakeholder Involvement, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


@2017-2024
Jl. Hayam Wuruk No. 34-38 Bandung
Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung
Powered by OJS (Open Jounal Systems)